My major discipline in GALILEO is psychology. Upon searching
for one I have never worked in before I realized that many of the sources use ProQuest
and EBSCOhost. Both databases I know I’ve used before. I found one call “web of
knowledge” it is a Thomas Reuters website that is apparently “Is the world’s
leading source of intelligent information for businesses and professionals”
according to their about us page (http://thomsonreuters.com/about/).
I searched “baseball” since I am currently writing about my Steve Blass Disease
project. You would never guess what one of the key words in the title of the
first link was “Decision taking under pressure: Evidence on football manager dismissals in
Argentina and their consequences”. Football? No, I said baseball.
What is kind of funny is that the seventh source mentioned
the word baseball and the nifty database highlighted the word baseball for me.
That could be useful during research.
The
difference between subject specific databases and the Discovery tool is that
the subject specific database is great for something directly relating that
field. Like baseball does not directly relate to psychology. If I searched
something like PTSD, a psychology database would be preferred over a literature
database. If I wanted to search baseball I would choose the Discovery tool
because I could use information that could fall under any category (history of
baseball, baseball in the media, etc).
