Apparently, peer-reviewed material can be wrong. This is something I did not know which makes me kind of mad honestly. What is the point of narrowing my search to only peer-reviewed articles if it is not correct information?
Why is peer-review important?
From what I understand, it really isn’t. The
information can be invalid regardless whether an article is reviewed or not. This
is crazy because I have searched only peer-reviewed articles in these data
bases provided by GALILEO for years. There would be hundreds of articles
available but NONE would be peer-reviewed. The ones that were peer-reviewed
usually didn’t go with my topic.
-What are some ways that you can tell if an article is peer-reviewed, or scholarly?
First: Search Galileo, those tend to be scholarly. Second: check the peer-reviewed check box in Galileo. Third: Check their references. The source you get your peer-reviewed article plays a large part in its credibility.
-When do you want to use peer-reviewed research in your work?
You would use it when you can but it is not essential to the process of research. If you have a basic idea of what you are researching about you should have a general idea when something is far-fetched.
-Also think about in what ways YOU engage in informal and/or formal peer-review in your personal and researching life
I don’t think I engage in peer-reviewing in my personal life. In my researching life, I am often flying solo so peers do not tend to review me. If someone presented me with a topic, verbally or written, I would give them my thoughts on their concepts but not formally.
Word Count: 297
